Insights

Integration · 2026-05-14 · 9 min

How we cut FMCG partner onboarding by 60% with an API-gateway pattern

Onboarding a sub-distributor took 5–7 weeks because master data was rekeyed into three systems. The fix was not more automation scripts — it was one door in, with a contract behind it.

The baseline nobody had measured

Before touching architecture we timed the actual process across six markets: median 34 working days from signed agreement to first order accepted. Only 4 of those days were system time. The rest was rekeying, waiting for a market IT owner, and correcting mismatched product codes.

If you cannot state the baseline in days, you cannot claim a percentage later. This is the first deliverable of every Integration Assessment we run.

Why point-to-point kept losing

Each market had built its own SAP ↔ DMS bridge. Four variants, four owners, no shared schema. A price-condition change meant four changes, four test cycles, and four different failure modes in production.

Point-to-point is not wrong at two systems. It becomes unmanageable at n systems across m markets, because the number of contracts you are implicitly maintaining is n×m and none of them are written down.

One door: the partner gateway

We published a single partner onboarding API: canonical partner, product and price-condition models, versioned, schema-validated at the edge. Sub-distributor systems talk to the gateway. Nothing talks to SAP directly.

Requests are idempotent on a partner-supplied key, so a retry after a timeout never creates a duplicate. Every rejection returns a machine-readable reason code, which turned a phone call into a fixable field error.

Events behind the door

Behind the gateway, a Solace event mesh carries partner-created, stock-updated and claim-raised events. SAP remains the system of record; Salesforce subscribes rather than being pushed to.

The important property is not speed. It is that a failed consumer does not fail the producer, and a dead-letter queue with replay means a bad afternoon is recoverable without re-running a file.

What actually produced the 60%

Three things, in order of contribution: removing double and triple data entry, returning validation errors at submission instead of at month-end, and giving each market a named interface owner with an SLA dashboard.

Final median: 13 working days, measured the same way as the baseline. Claim-cycle time fell 22% as a second-order effect of clean partner master data.

What we would do differently

Publish the canonical model in month one, before any code. We spent six weeks negotiating product-code semantics that should have been a week-one workshop with commercial, not an IT decision.

Bring the initiative that is stuck. We will tell you what we would do in the first two weeks.

Thirty minutes, an architect on the call, no deck. You leave with a position on sequencing and risk whether or not you hire us.